# FILE NAME: 00001117.soc
# TITLE: Is it better to have a monarchy or a republic? [60ef925ace50d0751958216ad642d411]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 2
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - In general, the group was in favour of the monarchy. They felt that it was a unique institution that brings with it a sense of national identity and continuity. They felt that the current system works well and should be maintained. They felt that it was an important part of the country's history and culture. They also felt that the monarchy is an important part of the tourism industry in the United Kingdom.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - It is better to have a monarchy than a republic.  It is a part of our heritage and brings with it continuity and stability.  Monarchs are often appointed for a long period of time, which brings with it consistency.  The monarchy also brings in tourism and all the associated monetary benefits.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - In general, the United Kingdom is a very successful country and we feel that the monarchy is a very small part of this success. The question of whether it is better to have a monarchy or republic is a vague one, and the answer depends on a lot of factors. A monarchy can provide stability and continuity, with a symbolic figurehead representing the nation. It may have been historical and cultural roots that instill a sense of national identity. On the other hand, a republic exercises democratic values and allows the mass public to have a degree of authority on the nation's key decisions. It promotes equal representation and can foster a sense of collective responsibility. We feel that the monarchy is something that is unique to the United Kingdom and something that we are proud of. However, the monarchy is something that is very costly and we feel that it is something that could be done away with and the country would still be very successful.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - It is better to have a republic than a monarchy. A republic is a system of government that is based on democracy and promotes equal representation. It is a system that can give the public a degree of power and control over key decisions affecting the country, while allowing for the opportunity for new voices to come forward. Having a monarchy can often lead to stability and continuity, however, there are problems with having a monarchy. A monarchy is a system where the position of monarch is handed down by bloodlines, and therefore monarchs can be selected irrespective of their ability to do the job. A monarchy is often accompanied by traditions and ceremonies that cost a lot of money to maintain. Monarchs are often wealthy, and their wealth can come from their role as the Head of State. The monarchy may not have any direct power, but they have an enormous influence over what is going on in the country. They are often the representatives of the country at important events, and in some cases, such as in the United Kingdom, they have the right to give royal assent for bills that are passed by parliament. Having a monarchy could also lead to problems of legitimacy and support. For example, people may disagree with the position of monarch and
3: 4,3,1,2
2: 1,2,3,4